Tuft, Lach, Jerabek & O'Connell, PLLC.

Get trusted advice from our
Family Law attorneys.
Call our firm at (651) 771-0050
Contact us by email
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Our Values
  • Our Team
    • Susan M. Lach, Attorney
    • Dan C. O’Connell, Attorney
    • Thomas W. Tuft, Attorney
    • John M. Jerabek, Attorney
    • Letty M-S Van Ert, Attorney
    • Lindsey E. O’Connell, Attorney
    • Alexandra M. Connell, Attorney
    • Allyson Kerr, Attorney
    • Amber J. Peabody, Firm Admin
    • Kathy J. Asper, Paralegal
    • Tammi M. Maxson, Paralegal
    • Marilyn K. Hoffies, Paralegal
    • Tracy Mae Cañete, LAA
    • Louise E. Currey, LAA
    • Libby D. Perkins, LAA
    • Breanna M. Barr, Receptionist
  • Family Law
    • Divorce/Dissolution
    • Adoption
    • Child Custody
    • Custody Evaluations
    • Third-Party Custody
    • Third-Party Visitation
    • Parenting Time
    • Child Support
    • Spousal Maintenance
    • Property Division
    • Orders for Protection
  • Additional Practice Areas
    • Mediation/ADR
    • Wills / Probate
    • Conservatorship / Guardianship
    • Juvenile Law
    • Professional Responsibility
  • Blog
  • Resources
    • Divorce Resource Finder
    • Questionnaires
    • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Make a Payment
  • Contact Us

Property Division

Dividing Marital Property

Tuft, Lach, Jerabek & O’Connell, PLLC has experience in representing clients in simple and complex property divisions. Under Minnesota law, as part of the divorce process, the court must make a just and equitable division of marital property. All property acquired after the marriage and before the valuation date is presumed to be marital regardless of title. The spouse wishing to establish that property is nonmarital has the burden of proving the asset is nonmarital. Our attorneys can help you determine what would be an equitable division of marital property in your situation.

In making a determination of an equitable division of marital property, the trial court must consider all relevant factors and the statutory factors:

  1. length of marriage;
  2. any prior marriage of a spouse;
  3. age of each spouse;
  4. health of each spouse;
  5. station and occupation of each spouse;
  6. amount and sources of income of each spouse;
  7. vocational skills and employability of each spouse;
  8. estate of each spouse;
  9. liabilities and needs of each spouse;
  10. opportunity for future acquisition of capital assets for each spouse;
  11. contribution of each spouse in the acquisition, preservation, depreciation, or appreciation in the amount or value of the marital property; and
  12. contribution of a spouse as a homemaker.

As part of the equitable division, if a spouse, in contemplation of commencing a marital dissolution proceeding or during the pendency of a marital dissolution proceeding, transfers, encumbers, conceals or disposes of marital property without the consent of the other spouse, the court shall compensate the other spouse by placing both parties in the same position that they would have been in had the transfer, encumbrance, concealment or disposal not occurred.

Nonmarital Property

If a spouse can prove that part of the parties’ estate is nonmarital property, that property will normally not be subject to division as part of the marital estate. Nonmarital property is real or personal property acquired before, during or after the marriage, which:

  1. is acquired as a gift, bequest, devise or inheritance made by a third party to one but not to the other spouse;
  2. is acquired before the marriage;
  3. is acquired in exchange for or is the increase in value of property which is described in clauses (a), (b), (d,) and (e);
  4. is acquired by a spouse after the valuation date; or
  5. is excluded by a valid antenuptial agreement.

In some cases, assets may have both marital and nonmarital components. For example, it is not uncommon for 401(k) accounts or even the marital homestead to have pre-marital values. To determine the value of nonmarital interests the court may distinguish between active and passive appreciation. In the case of a homestead, the courts apply a formula, which provides that a spouse’s nonmarital interest in a homestead purchased prior to the marriage is equal to the proportion the spouse’s net equity at the time of marriage bore to the value of the property at the date of marriage. This is often referred to as the “Schmitz” formula. Depending upon the type of asset and the particular circumstances of each case, nonmarital claims may be complex to establish. The family law attorneys at Tuft & Lach, PLLC can help you identify the value of non-marital property and can help you establish and defend your entitlement to your non-marital property.

In some cases, if the circumstances warrant, the court may award up to one-half of a spouse’s nonmarital property to the other spouse if necessary to avoid an unfair hardship on the other spouse. In determining whether an unfair hardship exists, the court must consider all factors including “the length of the marriage, any prior marriage of a spouse, the age, health, station, occupation amount and sources of income, vocational skills employability, estate, liabilities, needs and opportunity for future acquisition of capital assets and the income of both parties.” The court is allowed significant discretion in making determinations on equitable property divisions and on determining whether unfair hardship exists.

For more information contact Tuft, Lach, Jerabek & O’Connell, PLLC at 651-771-0050 to schedule a consultation with one of our experienced family law attorneys.

Best Lawyers 2017

Family Law Practice Areas:

  • Divorce/Dissolution
  • Child Custody
  • Mediation/ADR
  • Property Division
  • Parenting Time (Visitation)
  • Child Support

I have read the disclaimerThe use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form..

Susan M. Lach

Dan O'Connell

Thomas Tuft

John M. Jerabek

Tuft, Lach, Jerabek & O'Connell, PLL

Tuft, Lach, Jerabek & O'Connell, PLLC
2109 County Road D East
Maplewood, MN 55109

Phone: (651) 771-0050
Fax: (651) 771-0850
Email: info@tuftlaw.com

© 2019 by Tuft, Lach, Jerabek & O'Connell, PLLC. All rights reserved. Disclaimer

Divorce Resource Finder Registration (Divorce Professionals Only)

Web Design and Marketing by VisibilityPartners.com